Friday, April 14, 2006

Whoring myself for fun and profit

I wasn't terribly surprised when I picked up a sweaty, used copy of the WaPo Express at the gym yesterday and saw that my rant against their crappy new score card-less production schedule had been cited in "The Blog Log*." I mean, it was pretty much a shoe in--as anyone who's read the "Log" more than twice knows, the three ways to pretty much guarantee you get excerpted are 1) mention the Express; 2) say something vaguely witty about how craptastic Metro service is; or 3) verbally fellate Butterstick.

I was, however, fairly pleased with the bit they chose to excerpt:

"Heh heh heh," I thought to myself. "They quoted me saying 'douchebags**.' Hot."

Once my initial giddiness at having reached such dazzling heights of local and ephemeral quasi-celebrity wore off, I started to get a little peeved. First, at the credit line. Jordan Baker "notes that this newspaper no longer prints" score cards? Notes???? That makes it sound so benign. "Oh, I see the Express is no longer printing a Nats special edition. Oh, bother. More Earl Grey, anyone?"

Seriously--notes???? Did you guys miss the part where I blamed you for ruining my life? More appropriate options: "mourns the loss of special editions," "excoriates this newspaper for no longer printing a special edition," "rails against 'the Man' at this newspaper for bringing her so much happiness last season, only to dash her spirits this year at opening day."

The thing that really sticks in my craw, though, is "[Internet]." Why the brackets, one might ask? Well, because my original post said "Internets," and the Blog Log apparently thought this was a typo.

Um, No.

Seriously, are you trying to tell me that a column that exists solely to monitor blogs has never seen the word "internets" before? It's common parlance around here, idiots. How common? 60,750 posts on Technorati common, that's how common. How common? Of the blogs I read daily (most of them local, Express, so they should be on your radar), I would guarantee I see at least one "internets" or "teh internets" every other day. How common? Urban Dictionary common. Wikipedia common. President Bush common.

And you thought it was a typo? You're not implying that the divinely appointed leader of the free world makes mistakes, are you Express? Are you????

Pinko Commie rag.

There's one way to make this up to me, Express, and it doesn't include printing a retraction. I don't want you to print a sad little mea culpa in tiny, tiny print that will be overlooked by even the most bored commuter in your target audience.

You know what I want, Express. You know how to make this better.

Bring. Back. The score cards.

*Mad props to I-66 for sending me the image and thus sparing you all the crappily formatted transcription I had here before.
**Not, I realize, terribly hard given the frequency with which I use this word.

16 comments:

kate said...

I do believe I smell a challenge!

Kris said...

I vote for a reprint with "rails against the Man."

Or maybe, "gets in her Internets craw." That would be stellar.

If they could incorporate "nucular" my head might explode.

Joseph said...

This is what The Blog Log will say in its next edition:

WE GET PWNED
"Seriously, are you trying to tell me that a column that exists solely to monitor blogs has never seen the word "[Internet]" before? It's common parlance around here, idiots. How common? 60,750 posts on Technorati common, that's how common. How common? Of the blogs I read daily (most of them local, Express, so they should be on your radar), I would guarantee I see at least one "[Internet]" or "[The Internet]" every other day. How common? Urban Dictionary common. Wikipedia common. President Bush common."

JORDANBAKER.BLOGSPOT.COM notes that this newspaper refuses to sacrifice its grammatical reputation.

Momentary Academic said...

You are famous. I'm still working on the electronic version of the score card.

Lady Tiara said...

you should write them a letter to the editor. they usually only run one letter a day, and they're usually unbelievably lame (today's letter writer complains that the horoscopes have been too negative lately; i think she is trying to be sarcastic, but failing miserably), but i always advocate writing letters. typing out the bile really helps. of course, typing out the bile into a blog post has pretty much the same effect i suppose.

Megarita said...

FAME! FAME! FAME! I'd love to know how they decided what to excerpt....

Kelly said...

Wow! And I knew you when (ie undergrad).

Blackbeard said...

Firstable, Congrats :-D

Secondmostofall, they probably just didn't want to get letters from people saying "Internets?! What's Internets?!?"

Just be happy you got douchebags, JB.

I-66 said...

I wonder why they chose to correct you instead of writing "Internets [sic]"

I mean, it's still stupid to presume that you'd made a typo, but at least then they're not changing the content...

Joseph said...

So true, blackbeard. Getting "douchebags" into the paper is no small feat. And, the more I think about it, the president saying "Internets" WAS funny, but I thought his other debate one-liner, "Want some wood?", was just as good.

Blackbeard said...

Oh - - right - - Douchebags was in the paper, too.

OH! SNAP! Oh, Snap!

mysterygirl! said...

I think that if I were to be quoted, chances are pretty good that either "douchebag" or "dog crap" would end up being featured. Sigh.

JordanBaker said...

kate: I will throw down with any pencil necked Express employee they send my way.

kris: I suppose they could say I "chose the nucular option."

joseph: if you lived here, you'd know that the Express doesn't really have a reputation--gramatical or otherwise--worth sacrificing.

MA: I was famous for twenty seconds yesterday until the commuters turned the page and forgot about me.

etta: sadly, I once wrote a letter to the editor of Express--and it got printed too. Well, part of it did. They edited it pretty heavily to fit in their tiny space, and I ended up looking like a giant whiner rather than. . .a funny giant whiner.

megarita: My guess is they have an intern whose job it is to Technorati "panda," "Express," and "metro DC" every day and come up with four or five quotations.

To that intern: thanks for using "douchebags;" embrace the internets.

kelly: yeah, way back when I was just writing letters to the editor of the Daily (Mascot).

blackbeard: Yes, douchebags is one thing I've got plenty of lately.

i-66: Exactly. Ex. Act. Ly.

joseph and blackbeard: I'll let you two work that out amongst yourselves.

MG!: Yeah. . .I should really just be grateful that they didn't quote me on a day when I wrote about some celebrity's tits.

(Or, as such days are known around here, Tuesdays).

Joseph said...

Could it be worse than the Times? I say this: If you got a bunch of traffic today based on that, write something snarky about them every week. I'd also include the D-word, so your site can become another No. 1 Google destination for "WaPo Express douchebags."

And as for the Technorati search you suggested, you're probably right ... and your story was the one hit that wasn't an area Chinese fast-food restaurant.

Neil said...

This time the WaPo Express picked the wrong blogger to screw over!

JordanBaker said...

joseph: Express is a free daily that's passed out at metro stations by extremely aggressive "vendors" (e.g. homeless people with yellow vests). Their journalistic credibility, yes, is probably on par with the Times, but their production quality is negligible.

Though I do like their snarky gossip column with the funny captions. Keep that up, Express guys!

neil: I know. Haven't they heard I'm loco?